Justice Samuel Alito rebutted Thursday what he called “unfair and damaging attacks” on the Supreme Court over its emergency adjudication of politically-charged cases, such as the Texas heartbeat law, which recently went into effect after the bench declined to block it.
Responding to criticisms that the conservative-dominated court has been strategically rushing into hasty decisions to advance a secret political agenda, Alito objected to the media’s use of the term “shadow docket” as a misnomer, and claimed such an accusation erodes the legitimacy of the federal judiciary.
“The catchy and sinister term ‘shadow docket’ has been used to portray the court as having been captured by a dangerous cabal that resorts to sneaky and improper methods to get its ways,” Alito remarked during an address at the University of Notre Dame. “This portrayal feeds unprecedented efforts to intimidate the court or damage it as an independent institution.”
In the wake of the court’s emergency rulings in the cases of the Texas heartbeat law, CDC eviction moratorium, and the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy, all of which favored conservatives, the Senate Judiciary Committee called a hearing Thursday to examine the “shadow docket” complaints.
“The media and political talk about the shadow docket is not serious criticism,” Alito commented, noting that emergency application is a standard procedure that is only invoked when the plaintiffs ask for it, which abortion providers did in the recent Texas heartbeat law situation. The legislation prohibits abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, long believed to be around six weeks of gestation.
“Journalists may think we can dash off an opinion the way they dash off articles,” he chided.
Since the Supreme Court rejected the opportunity to assess the Texas heartbeat measure, given the small time window afforded by the complainants, the pro-abortion lobby has reacted with apocalyptic protestations that Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion at the national level, has been all but reversed.
Alito called these “false and inflammatory claims,” adding, “We did no such thing and we said that expressly.”
He clarified that the Supreme Court issued emergency application for the Texas case because abortion proponents objecting to the law sought relief just over a day before it was scheduled to be implemented. “They asked us to rule within hours on the papers,” he said.
However, the Supreme Court will hear a potential challenge to the 1973 landmark case in December with Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case on the docket concerning a Mississippi law that bans abortions after fifteen weeks. The law was escalated to the High Court after a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals barred its enforcement, arguing it violated the precedent of Roe v. Wade and subsequent rulings.
In addressing emergency appeals, the Supreme Court is not conniving with ulterior motives but is rather simply following protocol, Alito confirmed.
“This picture is very sinister and threatening, but it is also very misleading,” he said. “There’s nothing — absolutely nothing new about emergency applications… There is nothing new or shadowy about the procedure we followed in those cases.”
Alito said that while the court has received many more emergency requests that require fast decision turnaround this cycle, the justices are not to blame.
“It’s like complaining about the emergency room for treating too many accident victims who come in,” he said. “What are we supposed to do? Are we supposed to decline to adjudicate them? Are we supposed to impose a quota? … It’s a silly criticism.”
Texas Becomes First State to Implement Fetal Heartbeat Law after Supreme Court Declines to Act
Biden Slams Supreme Court Decision on Texas Heartbeat Law: ‘Unconstitutional Chaos’
Supreme Court Will Hear Major Abortion Case on December 1
Justice Alito's political case for SCOTUS transcendence of politics
Justice Samuel Alito pushed back Thursday against criticism, including some from colleagues, that recent Supreme Court actions in major cases have been done hastily and in the shadows. “A dangerous cabal” improperly deciding important matters — hardly, he said.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last week railed against the Biden administration’s decision to trim the state’s monoclonal antibody treatment allocation because of an increase in demand nationwide that the governor partially credited himself for after his months-long campaign promoting the COVID-19 alternate to vaccines.
Members of the Progressive Caucus are refusing to approve an infrastructure bill until a much larger package makes more progress.
The sham audit actually increased Biden’s vote. But Arizona Republicans’ goal was never to overturn the last election – it was to lay the groundwork for overturning the next one Contractors hired by the Republican-controlled Arizona senate examined votes in May. Photograph: Matt York/AP “Humiliation.” “Embarrassment.” “Trump a Bigger Loser than First Thought.” Last week, the Arizona Republicans’ sham election “audit” ended with a whimper rather than a bang. Launched in April to help Donald Trump
AOC blasted Manchin's maximum price tag of $1.5 trillion, $2 trillion less than the proposed $3.5 trillion bill
Trump's Russia special counsel John Durham is misrepresenting mysterious Trump-Russia link, researchers say
During a House hearing on abortion Thursday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., excoriated a witness who had asserted that women who have been raped have ample time to seek abortion care under a controversial new Texas law.
Sen. Mitt Romney on Friday blasted House Democrats for blocking a bipartisan infrastructure bill due to disagreements within the party.
A federal court has rejected Pfizer’s (PFE) claims against the government in a case with major implications for drug pricing. The pharmaceutical giant’s lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, filed last year, sought a legal green light for proposed programs that would help cover co-pays for Medicare patients prescribed the cardiovascular drug tafamidis, which Pfizer priced at $225,000 a year. In an opinion issued Thursday, Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil of U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Pfizer’s request for a ruling that the proposed programs would not violate anti-kickback laws.
President Joe Biden met with House Democrats Friday afternoon, as progressive and moderate Democrats negotiate the infrastructure deal and climate and social spending plan. CBS News political contributors and Democratic strategists Joel Payne and Antjuan Seawright joined CBSN to discuss.
Moderate Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia reiterates that the maximum amount that he's willing to put toward his party's social-spending plan is $1.5 trillion, and he offers a solution to colleagues who want bigger outlays.
A group of teachers is challenging the city order, saying thousands of public school employees will be forced out of work if it remains in effect.
Pelosi calls reconciliation bill 'a culmination of my service in Congress'
J.D. Martinez hasn't looked like himself in months, but his outburst Wednesday could be just what the Red Sox slugger needs to find his stride and vault Boston into the postseason, writes John Tomase.
Just before midnight on Sept. 1, the debate over whether the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority will dramatically change life in America took on a new ferocity when the justices let a near-total ban on abortion in Texas take effect. "There's no doubt that the court's legitimacy is under threat right now," lawyer Kannon Shanmugam, who frequently argues cases at the court, said at an event organized by the conservative Federalist Society.
Gov. Ron DeSantis made it official on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show on Wednesday night. He used the moment to deflect from talk that he is on course to run for president in 2024 and announced he is indeed running for reelection.
Top prospects Anton Lundell and Spencer Knight are the main attractions, but another rookie is emerging as a real contender to make the Panthers.
A federal court on Thursday ordered the Federal Election Commission to rule on pending complaints that allege the National Rifle Association used shell entities to illegally coordinate campaign spending with federal candidates, including with the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump. In 2019, the Washington-based nonpartisan watchdog group Campaign Legal Center Action sued the FEC on behalf of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a gun-control advocacy group led by former Democratic Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords, after the federal agency failed to act on multiple complaints that accused the gun rights group of perpetrating what plaintiffs called "an elaborate scheme … to unlawfully coordinate with candidates it supports for federal office."
Rohit Chopra, a former FTC commissioner, is expected to step up the CFPB's enforcement activities and focus on student loans.