Having originally included provisions
in the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill currently
making its way through the Scottish Parliament, the Scottish
Government has since agreed to remove these sections from the Bill
and publish a Bill specifically designed to tackle the problem of
Scotland's relationship with alcohol. It is intended to be
taken as part of the wider framework relating to alcohol,
particularly building on
Changing Scotland's Relationship with Alcohol: A Framework for
Action, the Government strategy published in March 2009
which outlined some of the ways in which alcohol misuse could be
tackled.
The Bill can be found on the Parliament website, at the
following web address:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/s3/bills/34-AlcoholEtc/
The Bill itself is relatively short, with relatively few
provisions. Whilst there is a political consensus that Scotland's
relationship with alcohol is damaging and needs to be changed; the
means of tackling the problem is not agreed upon.
This briefing paper will outline the main proposals of the
bill.
PART 1
ALCOHOL LICENSING
The key aspects of the Bill are:
Pricing of alcohol
This will establish a minimum retail price per unit of
alcohol. This will also impact on multi-buy purchases,
whereby the price of multiple purchases has to be at least
equivalent to the total price of buying all products
separately. This will effectively stop all buy one get one
free, or 3 for 2 offers. The briefing paper will consider
minimum pricing in more detail below, but one significant omission
from this is an indication of what the price will be: the
bill has been drafted in a way that leaves this decision to be made
by the Scottish Ministers, and therefore can be amended without
altering the bill itself.
Drinks promotions
The Bill will extend the provisions of the 2005 Licensing
(Scotland) Act, which currently bans promotions in licensed
premises such as pubs and clubs, to off-sales premises too.
Age verification policy
This will make age verification policies such as "Challenge 21"
or "Think 25" mandatory. Many retailers already operate these
on a voluntary basis.
Sale of alcohol to under 21s etc.
Licensing Boards will be required to produce a "detrimental
impact statement" which will detail the effect of agreeing to
approve an off-sales licence to those under 21 and whether this is
having a detrimental effect on one or more of the licensing
objectives in the whole or part of the Licensing Board's area.
PART 2
LICENCE HOLDERS: SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEVY
This aspect of the bill would see charges levied on city centre
entertainment venues to cover costs including increased street
cleaning and policing costs caused by the adverse impacts
associated with these businesses.
Minimum Pricing of Alcohol
Evidence: The University of Sheffield study [1] cited by the
Scottish Government applies a modelling technique, first carried
out on English and Welsh data, to Scottish survey data taken from
the 2003 Scottish Health Survey. The publication does not
include specific recommendations on what a minimum price per unit
should be; but rather outlines the estimated percentage decrease in
alcohol consumption at a range of prices, and the impact of
off-trade promotional sales on the overall level of
consumption.
Table 1: main findings of the Sheffield University:
impact of pricing on consumption, health, crime, and
work
|
Policy scenario
Minimum price
|
Change in consumption (%) (with off-trade discount
ban)
|
Health impact:
Hospital admissions- year one (%) (full
effect)
|
Crime outcomes - total crimes (%)
|
Work outcomes- Days absence (%)
|
Work outcomes - unemployment (%)
|
|
25p
|
-0.2 (-3.2)
|
-0.0 (-0.2)
|
+0.2
|
-0.2
|
-0.1
|
|
30p
|
-0.5 (-3.5)
|
-0.1 (-0.7)
|
+0.1
|
-1.3
|
-0.2
|
|
35p
|
-1.3 (-4.1)
|
-0.4 (-1.8)
|
-0.3
|
-4.7
|
-0.4
|
|
40p
|
-2.7 (-5.4)
|
-0.8 (-3.6)
|
-1.1
|
-11.6
|
-0.8
|
|
45p
|
-4.2 (-7.1)
|
-1.5 (-6.0)
|
-2.5
|
-21.7
|
-1.2
|
|
50p
|
-7.2 (-9.2)
|
-2.2 (-8.9)
|
-4.2
|
-34.6
|
-1.7
|
|
55p
|
-10.0 (-11.7)
|
-3.0 (-12.0)
|
-6.2
|
-49.9
|
-2.2
|
|
60p
|
-12.9 (-14.3)
|
-3.9 (-15.1)
|
-8.3
|
-66.1
|
-2.6
|
|
65p
|
-15.9 (-17.1)
|
-4.8 (-18.2)
|
-10.4
|
-83.5
|
-3.0
|
|
70p
|
-18.9 (-20.0)
|
-5.7 (-21.3)
|
-12.7
|
-101.0
|
-3.3
|
Source: summary of findings of Sheffield University
(adaptation of tables 3.7 and 3.8)
40p is the minimum price which is often used as an example,
although there has never been any confirmation (but also, no firm
denial), of the threshold the government would set.
A study by Queen Margaret University and Royal Edinburgh
Hospital researchers, which focused on users accessing alcohol
problems services in Edinburgh, concluded that "The lower the price
that a patient paid per unit, the more units he/she consumed ." [2] This study
found that the average price per unit paid by users accessing
alcohol problems services is below the average price per unit paid
in Scotland as a whole. That means that people with alcohol
problems are purchasing cheaper alcohol than the general
population. Therefore minimum pricing is likely to have a higher
impact on this group than the population as a whole.
Alcohol industry reaction to minimum pricing proposals
The alcohol industry, in particular the Scotch Whisky
Association (SWA) are opposing the minimum pricing policy contained
in the Alcohol Etc (Scotland) Bill. They suggest that minimum
pricing will damage sales at home and internationally. The SWA
re-affirm that the industry has an "ongoing commitment to
discourage the misuse of alcohol and help tackle Scotland's problem
drinking culture." [3] The SWA claim that
the Government will be "penalising the majority in order to
discourage the minority that drink excessively.
Projected impacts of minimum pricing policy on retail
prices of alcohol
The most significant price increases can be seen in the strong,
cheap cider and cheap spirits. This corroborates comments
made by Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon who maintains that this
policy is intended to target "[t]hose who are damaging themselves
and others by bingeing on dirt-cheap alcohol." [4]
- Using even a relatively cheap whisky as an indicator, whisky
will be relatively unaffected by minimum pricing.
- Switching to wine may be an unintended consequence of minimum
pricing if the minimum price is set at a fairly low rate, such as
40p, as much wine is currently priced above this rate per unit
anyway.
Party positions on minimum pricing
Conservative: The Conservatives are opposed to
a minimum pricing policy; favouring instead better enforcement of
current legislation relating to underage drinkers, and exploring
tax increases on "problem drinks such as alcopops and strong
cider". [5] They also are concerned with
the adverse effects which they believe minimum pricing may have on
the Scottish economy and Scottish jobs, particularly highlighting
the "immense damage" which would be inflicted on the Scottish
whisky trade; and believe that it is "probably illegal" under EU
competition law [6].
Labour: Labour have come out strongly against
the policy, and have also announced a commission to examine the
over-consumption of alcohol, chaired by Professor Sally Brown,
emeritus professor of education at Stirling University. They
have criticised the Government for not having released legal advice
received on the question as to whether setting a minimum price is
legal within EU competition policy. [7]
The party is also are concerned that supermarkets would be the
primary beneficiaries of any additional revenue generated as a
result of a minimum pricing policy.
Lib Dem: The Lib Dems are opposed to the
policy: they criticise it for failing to bring about
"fundamental, rather than marginal, cultural change", and also
suggest that the policy would be "almost certainly illegal".
They point out that the recent Scottish Health Survey identifies
professionals (and especially professional women) as problem
drinkers [8]; whilst several areas in
Scotland which are not classified as having high levels of
deprivation still report alcohol-related death rates significantly
above the national UK average [9],
suggesting that universal culture change is what the focus should
be on, rather than concentrating on one particular demographic: in
this case, low income 'problem drinkers'.
Green: Green Co-Convener Patrick Harvie has
previously supported the policy, saying: "A minimum price policy
isn't a silver bullet, but alongside other sensible changes it
could play a very positive part in improving public health." [10]
The Church Response
The Salvation Army has had a long history of practical work with
those whose lives have been directly affected by excessive
drinking; but they also stress that Scotland's alcohol problem is
not simply a matter for the individual: "taking an approach to
excessive drinking that focusses purely on individual behaviour
fails to acknowledge that we live in a society in which the
consequences of excessive drinking are shared by us all, and that
we have a collective responsibility to address the issue. The
social costs of increased health problems which divert NHS
resources away from mainstream health care, the increased violence
in our towns and cities and damage to family relationships are
borne by us all. If an increase in the minimum price of alcohol
will reduce the levels of alcohol consumption resulting in a
reduction in problems for individuals and our society, then the
argument that makes the case that this would penalise the majority
in order to discourage the minority is one that denies that we all
have a part to play in tackling the issue. This is a choice that
we, as a society, could make in order to improve our collective
health and wellbeing, and particularly that of the most vulnerable
and poor."
The Salvation Army has been a constant supporter of a minimum
alcohol pricing strategy for a long period of time, and has
recently urged party leaders from all political groupings within
the Scottish Parliament to urge them to consider the evidence in
support of minimum pricing- and other measures- that will seek to
begin to address the endemic problem with alcohol consumption in
Scotland.
Next steps
The Bill has been introduced to the Scottish Parliament and will
be considered in the Health and Sport Committee, who are seeking
views on the provisions of the Bill, with a deadline of Wednesday
20 January 2010. Any individuals or organisations with an
interest in this policy area are invited to respond to this
consultation: further details can be found on the Health & Sport Committee bill pages on the
Scottish Parliament website, or by contacting SCPO.
back to top
[
1] "Model-Based Appraisal of Alcohol Minimum Pricing and
Off-Licensed Trade Discount Bans in Scotland: A Scottish adaptation
of the Sheffield Alcohol Policy version 2", http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/09/24131201/0
[
2] Black, Gill and Chick (2009), "Alcohol units consumed and
price paid per alcohol unit by patients of the Lothian Alcohol
Problems Services, with a comparison to wider alcohol sales in
Scotland", SCHAAP
[
3]
"Scottish Legislative Programme - Scotch Whisky Association
Response"
[
4] Scottish Government news release, 28 Sept
2009
[
5] Scottish Labour must stop dithering and come off the fence
on minimum pricing, Scottish Conservatives website, 6 Nov 2009
6 No to blanket minimum
pricing: Labour backs long-term Conservative calls, Scottish
Conservatives website, 26 Nov 2009
7 Richard Simpson MSP,
"Minimum pricing is not the answer to our booze
culture", The Scotsman, 26 November 2009
[
8] Liberal Democrat press release, 23 Oct 2009
[
9] Robert Brown, Parliamentary Question S3W-27989, 6 November
2009
[
10] Minimum price for alcohol set at 40p, Scotland
on Sunday, 5 July 2009,